This week I chose the
media technology research paper From
Moodle to Facebook: Exploring students’ motivation and experiences in online
communities by Liping Deng
and Nicole Judith Tavares from the
journal Computers & Education. The
qualitative method used in the paper was individual interviews with 14
pre-service teachers. The interviews lasted between 30 and 80 min, and both
authors conducted most of the interviews together. The paper examines the
student teachers’ experiences with and perceptions of using Facebook and
Moodle. The purpose was to see which factors have bigger impact on students’
engagement in online discussions on the two online platforms. The paper
investigates why they were not actively involved in voluntary online
discussions on Moodle, and how they were encouraged to voluntarily participate
in online discussions on both Facebook and Moodle. The usage data from Moodle
was collected and analyzed, but the data from the Facebook group that the
students also used was only collected in the interviews when the student
teachers gave them the information since the researchers didn’t have any access
to the Facebook group.
The benefits of using qualitative methods are
that you get very specific information, which can be valuable for certain
topics and types of research. In this case they used interviews and interviewed
14 persons that were in the target group of the research. The interviews were
explorative which means that they had a few topics and guiding questions for
the participants to answer and from there they would rather explore what was
going on on the online platforms rather than expect anything and ask already
decided questions.
The limitations are that it’s impossible to
generalize the information that they got during the interviews. This case is
only possible to apply to that group of student teachers, since they all were
from the same university in Hong Kong. They were all part of the same online
community on both Facebook and Moodle. To improve the results I would have
interviewed both students and teachers to get both sides. It would have been
interesting to see what the teachers did to encourage the students to use the
discussion board on Moodle, if they did so.
Case
study
A case study is research method with the aim to
give a deeper knowledge of what the research is about. The basic idea is to
collect empirical data with both qualitative and quantitative methods for
example interviews, questionnaires and focus groups. There are numerous of aims
with the use of case studies; providing description, testing or generating
theory.
I chose a paper called “Structuring the discourse
on social networks for learning: Case studies on blogs and microblogs” in the
journal Computers
in Human Behavior. The paper was about blogs and microblogs and how
they can be used in education to improve student interaction. In the case study
in this paper the authors used questionnaires with both open and closed
questions. They interviewed some participant sand collected data from the
applications for the blogs and microblogs.
Hey Deborah!
SvaraRaderaThank you for some good reading. I believe that the conducted methodology is one of the best ways of collecting qualitative empirical data, data that can be analyzed and discussed further down in an article. One thing I noticed in your text was that you stated that the authors conducted all interviews together. Do you believe that that can cause a problem, that the person interviewed can feel undermined if they are being interviewed by to many persons at the same time? This is something I usually take under consideration when I'm in a group project. Five persons should not, in my opinion, interview one single participant.