I chose a journal called New Media & Society with an impact
factor at 1.824. It is an international journal
that publishes research articles within the subjects; communication, media and
culture, but also sociology, geography, anthropology, economics, the political
and information sciences and the humanities.
In the journal New Media & Society I chose to read the
article Morality and ethics behind the screen: Young people's perspectives on
digital life by Andrea Flores
and Carrie James. 61 qualitative interviews were held with youth from a few
high schools and colleges around Boston. The paper had a focus on moral and
ethics and the main questions to the students were what they thought when
posting something online.
Briefly explain to a first year student what theory
is, and what theory is not.
Theory is a term that is hard to define,
since it’s defined differently depending on the discipline. It is a lot easier
to define what theory is not. Theory is for example not references, data,
variables, diagrams or hypotheses. References, data, variables, diagrams and
hypotheses can rather be seen as parts that back up a theory. A theory tries to
answer the question Why something
happens.
Describe the major theory or theories that are used in
your selected paper. Which theory type (see Table 2 in Gregor) can the theory or theories be
characterized as?
The main
theory in the paper I chose was a moral development theory that can help
understand young people’s approaches to online life. The theory is based on
studies in psychology (Kohlberg, 1981, 1984; Piaget, 1965;
Selman, 1975; Turiel, 1983). Kohlberg’s stage theory can help people understand
how youth thinks when they’re online. The stage theory describes an evolution
of moral thinking in different stages; with focus on the self, to known others,
to society and toward the establishment of abstract principles, such as
justice.
Which are the benefits and
limitations of using the selected theory or theories?
The benefits of using this theory are
that it can easily be used to discuss some of the results from the qualitative
interviews. The interviews showed that many students don’t think about the
consequences when they post things online, which shows that the students are at
the first stage in Kohlberg’s stage theory; they only think twice when they
think the post can affect themselves. I think the theory is a good choice for
this paper because it kind of gives a clear view of at which stage the students
are and you can easily see which stages that follows and how they can reach
them.
I liked how you described the benefits of using qualitative methods in form of interviews in the paper you selected. It would also be interesting to see what the limitations were. I know that interviews can take a lot of time (prepare, transcript etc.). And it is shown that people tend to be more careful on what they say on interviews especially if the questions are ethical questions. Do you think that they gave honest answers during the interview?
SvaraRadera